“On the green side of things, we are slower to the game and have a lot of catching up to do to get us back on track. The government’s action plan on maritime and port development announced late last year will help us to get there.”
He was speaking in an interview on the sidelines of an international conference organised by the Asian Shipowners Association on Tuesday.
Having ranked as the world’s top container port for most of the period from 1987 to 2004, Hong Kong last year failed for the first time to make the top 10, knocked into 11th place by Dubai’s Jebel Ali port, according to shipping data provider Alphaliner.
In December the government unveiled an action plan on maritime and port development to enhance industry competitiveness and high-value services capacity through decarbonisation initiatives, digitalisation of processes, tax concessions and collaboration with overseas partners and neighbouring cities in Guangdong province.
02:19
China’s first home-grown large cruise ship set to begin sea trials
China’s first home-grown large cruise ship set to begin sea trials
Banga said the government’s strategy on procuring greener marine fuel by being open to various lower carbon fuels – pursuing liquefied natural gas as a transition fuel while exploring the feasibility of using green methanol to power vessels – is the right move.
Flexibility is needed given it is possible that in the future, different types of vessels plying their trade on different routes may end up using different transition fuels because of costs and availability considerations, he noted.
That is despite the fact that such a strategy may necessitate the establishment of two sets of bunkering infrastructure, which will add to costs.
“Right now it is too early to tell which alternative fuel is going to win the race,” he said. “No shipowner or government around the world is putting all their eggs in one basket.”
Hong Kong, a free port, has the advantage of being close to a rising supply of green methanol in mainland China, while also having access to other potential sources of environmentally friendly fuels overseas if they can be imported and used cost effectively and safely, he said.
However, to realise the government’s goal of turning Hong Kong into a high-quality green fuel bunkering centre, finding suitable land in the city or neighbouring cities in Guangdong to store the fuels will be key, he added.
To accelerate the decarbonisation of the industry, he said all stakeholders including various government departments, shipowners, fuel suppliers, bunkering infrastructure providers and port operators need to be brought together to collaborate, and one government body needs to take responsibility for driving results.
Meanwhile, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), a United Nations agency, and the International Chamber of Shipping are deliberating over several proposed global mechanisms to put a price on the industry’s greenhouse gas emissions, said IMO secretary general Arsenio Dominguez.
“Now the focus is on what will be the cost impact of these measures … we are working on 20 scenarios,” he said, adding that the study’s findings will be presented to the IMO’s marine environment protection committee at the end of September.
Last summer, the IMO committed its 175 member nations to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, with a target to slash emissions per unit of transport work by at least 40 per cent by 2030 compared with 2008 levels. Additionally, it aims to boost the industry’s uptake of near zero-emission fuels to at least 5 per cent by the end of the decade.
The IMO was also tasked with coming up with common technical standards for green bunker fuel and a unified mechanism to impose a cost on emissions to create a level playing field globally.