Opinion | Hong Kong should stop agonising over waste charging and focus on recycling

For a start, it would put the environmental hygiene department’s public refuse collection points under one centralised authority, making it easier to upgrade and integrate the lot into the citywide community recycling network currently managed by the Environmental Protection Department.

By integrating the roughly 170 public refuse collection points in the urban areas with the 220 recycling points, Hong Kong would have a scaled-up network of waste collection and recycling for its community.

Meanwhile, the Housing Department, responsible for managing the 258 public rental housing estates that accommodate about 2.1 million residents, should also play a role in waste management.

06:46

Hi-tech vs low-tech: Hong Kong to lose its only drinks-carton recycler to a microelectronics centre

Hi-tech vs low-tech: Hong Kong to lose its only drinks-carton recycler to a microelectronics centre

The government, with the support of the Environmental Protection Department, needs to centralise coordination through the Environment and Ecology Bureau, which holds policy responsibilities.

By addressing the fragmented structure of waste management and promoting institutional reforms, Hong Kong can establish an efficient and comprehensive recycling system that benefits both the environment and society.

The policies needed for reform should be led by Chief Secretary Eric Chan Kwok-ki, whose work can be divided into three phases, for the short, medium and long term.

At the outset, a thorough understanding is needed of the city’s public refuse collection points, including their number, distribution and locations, as well as the division of labour in waste handling.

06:47

SCMP Explains: How does Hong Kong handle its waste?

SCMP Explains: How does Hong Kong handle its waste?

The first task is to deal with food waste, which makes up the single largest category of Hong Kong’s municipal solid waste.

In 2022, out of 11,130 tonnes of solid waste, food waste constituted nearly 30 per cent, or about 3,300 tonnes. The bulk of this, at 2,300 tonnes, was domestic waste while the remaining 1,000 tonnes came from commercial and industrial sources, including restaurants, hotels, wet markets, and the food production and processing industries.

The government outsources the management of all this food waste. Waste collectors and recyclers are contracted to transport all the food waste to treatment centres.

For instance, about 150 public housing estates have adopted “smart” food waste recycling bins, which the government rents from suppliers at a monthly cost of about HK$2,000 per bin. The cost of this scheme is expected to rise to HK$110 million (US$14.08 million) for the 2024-2025 financial year. Such a high cost surely calls for a review of the alternatives.
Could Hong Kong learn from the waste collection strategies in Taiwan, Japan, and Singapore? Their practices, with different types of waste collected at designated times and dates, are worth considering.

In the grand scheme of things, the government should not overlook the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department. Hong Kong has 4,400 hectares of farmland, of which 3,700 hectares constitute fallow agricultural land. Turning food waste into fertiliser and making it a critical component of our local agricultural system is a way forward.

The Science Park, EcoPark and local universities should also invest resources in scientific research on waste recycling and treatment to help the government make the best decisions. This will create an industrial ecosystem that combines the best practices and research.

If Hong Kong can implement a system that incorporates waste collection, classification and recycling, as well as the conversion of waste to energy and biofertilisers, its blueprint for green development will become reality.

03:36

Japan looks to human waste as fertiliser prices soar

Japan looks to human waste as fertiliser prices soar

But first, the government must abandon the mentality of outsourcing. Such an ambitious blueprint requires the active participation of officials. Professional consultants may be called in to help but in the long run, it will be up to government officials to engage with the research process and field studies to ensure accountability.

In this, certain responsibilities will lie with Deputy Chief Secretary Warner Cheuk Wing-hing. He has to continue driving institutional reform for effective waste management. He also has to see to the rewording of rules and regulations for waste classification by analysing the existing system and the proposed waste-charging scheme, while researching new recycling technologies.

Also, Legislative Council members and the district councils should support the government in solving problems and meeting challenges, instead of merely criticising the policies. They can propose solutions based on the conditions of their respective districts, considering factors such as the prevalence of public or private housing. Tailoring the waste collection model to each district’s circumstances will improve the effectiveness of the entire recycling ecosystem.

A strong recycling framework is also a boon to the green industry. A Legco report found that in South Korea, for instance, a concerted effort to boost the recycling rate led to revenue from its recycling industry soaring from HK$1.7 billion in 2001 to HK$7 billion in 2009.
Hong Kong should walk the talk and promote the recycling industry; the circular economy’s “waste to wealth” mantra is not an overstatement. Raising people’s environmental awareness through recycling can boost social cohesion and cultivate a sense of belonging – a rewarding policy in more ways than one.

Mathias Woo is co-artistic director and executive director of Zuni Icosahedron

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Chronicles Live is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – chronicleslive.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment