Defence spending has now formally joined a long and growing queue of impossible budgetary imperatives facing governments worldwide, and among Nato’s 31 members in particular.
How to reconcile depleted coffers and diminished revenues – following the punishing pandemic years with record levels of debt, rising debt service costs, increasing healthcare, education, social security and pensions costs and the daunting costs linked with mitigating climate change and getting to “ net zero” by 2050 – has already pushed many governments into what the Financial Times’ Chris Giles calls “fiscal fantasies”.
02:12
Russia launches missile drills to test its ability to deliver ‘massive’ retaliatory nuclear strike
Russia launches missile drills to test its ability to deliver ‘massive’ retaliatory nuclear strike
Demands for more military spending have many political leaders blinking in the headlights, but they make the imperative for action no less pressing. Even a pacifist like me needs to concede that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s brutal assault on Palestinians have together transformed the defence-funding debate.
The need to be prepared to defend against armed assault is no longer a remote “poor country” problem and instead is now everyone’s urgent budgetary priority. Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg was prompt to call out the reckless unrealism of Trump’s comments, but in the same breath he said that, by this year, the defence budgets of 18 of Nato’s 31 members would rise above the 2 per cent of GDP level required.
In 2016, only five members spent at this level. Today, Poland spends 3.9 per cent of its GDP on defence – even higher than the 3.5 per cent spent by the US itself. Perhaps not surprisingly, many of the Nato states that share a border with Russia are now spending above the 2 per cent threshold.
At the same time, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz reiterated commitments to lift his country’s defence budget above 2 per cent of GDP for the first time, up from 1.57 per cent. Since his Zeitenwende (“watershed moment”) speech shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he has steered German defence spending sharply upwards. Germany is expected to spend almost €72 billion (US$77.5 billion) on defence this year, compared with a regular budget provision of €52 billion.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk (left) and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz leave a news conference at the Chancellery in Berlin on February 12. Under Scholz’s chancellorship, Germany is committed to raising its defence spending to the 2 per cent of GDP expected of Nato members. Photo: Bloomberg
But Scholz’s dilemma is similar to that faced by many other Western leaders. How can he meet these new defence obligations on a sustainable basis when there are so many other pressing demands on his budget?
A study by the German Economic Institute calculated that the army had been “underfunded relative to Nato standards” by at least €394 billion. Today, it is even less well funded than it was before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, in part because of support for Kyiv.
The task of rebuilding the German military is likely to be daunting and uncomfortably expensive. Israel is reportedly spending US$269 million a day on its war in Gaza. According to the Rand Corporation, Russia spent over US$40 billion in the first seven months of its war on Ukraine, with gross losses to GDP of between US$80 billion and US$100 billion.
With global debt estimated by the Institute of International Finance at about US$307 trillion – amounting to more than 330 per cent of global GDP – and debt service costs soaring to record levels, the immediate pressure facing most governments is not to add to the fiscal burden but to cut spending and find new ways of raising revenue.
This applies even to the United States, where the Congressional Budget Office last week complained that government finances were on an unsustainable path, with public debt likely to rise from 97.3 per cent last year to an all-time record in 2028 and to 116 per cent in 2034. Presumably, that will not greatly trouble Trump, where a surge in military spending would probably converge with his call to bolster national security.
But, for many leaders worldwide, this surge must be deeply unsettling. The need for higher military spending simply joins a long queue of budgetary imperatives. Worse, the defence imperative is likely to jump straight to the head of that queue, adding further to the fiscal challenges leaders face.
In response, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, concerned that prospects for global growth are at the lowest level in decades, are calling for reinvigoration of inclusive and sustainable growth, building resilience, supporting reforms focused on the climate challenge, pandemic preparedness, skills development, and rebuilding multilateral institutions and international cooperation. I admire their sense of focus but fear they are moving deckchairs on the Titanic.
David Dodwell is CEO of the trade policy and international relations consultancy Strategic Access, focused on developments and challenges facing the Asia-Pacific over the past four decades
Denial of responsibility! Chronicles Live is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – chronicleslive.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
