The former diplomat stressed: “Pakistan’s economy and, particularly, its textile and pharmaceutical sectors, stand to gain from trade with India given their dependence on raw materials from India.”
He said internal consultation on the issue was required from Pakistan, coupled with some quiet diplomacy with India so that the proposal would be on the table when a new government took office in Delhi in June.
On Thursday, however, Pakistan’s foreign office spokeswoman Mumtaz Zahra Baloch denied the possibility of resuming trade with India. “Pakistan-India trade relations have been non-existent since 2019 … There is no change in Pakistan’s position on it,” Baloch said.
Some geopolitical analysts in Pakistan have also criticised Dar’s comments.
“Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar spoke about trade with India – continuing a habit among Pakistani elites of seeking a hand of friendship that simply does not exist. This is a matter of concern – but hardly new,” said Mosharraf Zaidi, columnist and public policy expert.
Dar, who helmed various economic ministries in Pakistan and served as finance minister under Shebaz Sharif’s government from 2022 to 2023, has closely monitored the worsening economic conditions in his country.
Trade with India has been a major concern for Pakistan’s business community, which feels burdened by the necessity of importing the same items via Dubai or other countries. Although Pakistan had previously considered importing sugar and cotton from India, the idea was rejected by the Khan cabinet.
For Dar, trade with India is already occurring but through a much costlier route, imposing higher costs on Pakistan. Direct trade between the two nations is seen as a logical step towards fostering better economic growth.
Its gross domestic product is 10 times smaller than India. In the 1970s, Pakistan’s per capita income was about twice India’s; today India’s is 50 per cent higher.
‘Gloomy new normal’?
Bisaria said trade should not be viewed in isolation, rather, it could be part of a basket of low-hanging fruit within the normalisation of bilateral relations. He stressed the necessity of a political signal preceding discussions on trade, connectivity, and fostering people-to-people links.
A natural first step, Bisaria suggested, would be for Pakistan to propose an exchange of high commissioners upon the inauguration of the new Indian government. “India would also expect some strong reassurance on curbing terrorism emanating from territory controlled by Pakistan.”
Bisaria noted that senior diplomats could strengthen the capacity of their missions and look for creative ideas for rapprochement in the second half of the year.
He however warned: “There is a reason for cautious optimism: a ceasefire has held for four years at the border, we have gone without spectacular acts of terrorism for five years after the Pulwama attack in 2019, and two new governments will be in place in both countries, willing to look at fresh ideas to address the relationship.”
02:21
Pakistan interior minister blames India after dozens killed in pair of suicide blasts
Pakistan interior minister blames India after dozens killed in pair of suicide blasts
On February 14, 2019, a suicide bombing in the Pulwama district of the Jammu and Kashmir region killed 40 Indian security personnel. India blamed Pakistan for the attack, which severely affected bilateral ties.
In the past, Pakistan signed agreements such as the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) to foster preferential trade with India. Yet, the nation has shown tepid interest in the process, with its leaders and foreign office maintaining a steadfast stance: demanding India address the contentious Kashmir issue before considering any normalisation of economic relations.
The current chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party and former foreign minister during 2022-23, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, has adopted a hardline stance against India in recent years, presenting a challenge for the new government regarding the potential trade resumption with India.
India, perhaps influenced by the approaching elections, has remained mum on the matter. However, geopolitical analysts speculate that India will be reluctant to engage in trade with Pakistan without significant steps from Pakistan to address terrorism in Kashmir. They suggest that immediate progress between Delhi and Islamabad is “unlikely”.
Can Shebaz Sharif thaw Pakistan-India ties as Kashmir remains sticking point?
Can Shebaz Sharif thaw Pakistan-India ties as Kashmir remains sticking point?
Afaq Hussain, co-founder and director at the Bureau of Research on Industry and Economic Fundamentals, told This Week in Asia the decision was within the framework of Pakistan’s historical proclivity towards economic ties with India under previous governments.
Citing a 2018 World Bank report projecting annual bilateral trade potential at US$37 billion, Hussain said this indicated “untapped opportunities awaiting exploration”.
Hussain highlighted, in particular, the impact of resumed trade on border economies. “Trade between India and Pakistan holds significant importance for border areas, which often bear the brunt of economic disruptions,” he said.
Give the challenging political landscape in India, particularly with impending elections, Hussain sees limited scope for immediate positive responses or initiatives from India’s side.
However, Hussain reiterated the significance of trade as a diplomatic tool for fostering bilateral engagement, suggesting it could serve as a precursor to broader discussions on political issues. “Trade provides a softer approach to reigniting diplomatic conversations between India and Pakistan,” he stated.
02:32
Facing its worst economic crisis, Pakistan reaches draft deal for critical US$3 billion IMF bailout
Facing its worst economic crisis, Pakistan reaches draft deal for critical US$3 billion IMF bailout
Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center, expressed scepticism regarding the prospects of improved trade ties any time soon.
“There is a past history of the two sides cooperating on trade even when relations are bad,” he explained, “but in more recent years they’ve settled into a gloomy new normal where political considerations hold the two back.”
Kugelman noted that India, being the larger economy, had “little economic incentive to trade with Pakistan” as it did not need more access to cheap imports.
“I don’t expect India to be more receptive to trade after its elections, as the ruling party will likely return, and it will maintain its consistent position of not engaging until Pakistan acts on India’s concerns about terrorism, even though Pakistan claims these concerns are unfounded,” Kugelman added.