Sam Altman has been accused by several employees as a “psychologically abusive, toxic” boss, who was manipulative and would double-cross people for the most basic things. People at OpenAI suspect that this was the reason why he was fired earlier
Since the abrupt removal of Sam Altman from the OpenAI board two weeks ago, the circumstances leading to this dramatic event remain shrouded in mystery.
Altman, who swiftly returned to the CEO position after his ouster, has maintained silence about the incident, and Microsoft, a significant OpenAI backer, has offered no insights. Even former board members, who resigned in the aftermath of Altman’s departure, have refrained from public disclosure.
Speculations abound, with various theories emerging to explain Altman’s sudden exit. Reports have surfaced, alleging manipulative and double-crossing behavior by Altman, including attempts to get a co-worker fired.
Related Articles
Down the drain: OpenAI foils Microsoft’s plan, won’t offer them, other investors seat on board
Homecoming: Sam Altman officially reinstated as OpenAI CEO, Microsoft gets observer seat on board
Recent coverage from the Washington Post claims that complaints were lodged with the OpenAI board, accusing Altman of “psychologically abusive” and “toxic” conduct, leading to internal debates among board members about addressing his behaviour.
Citing unnamed sources, the Washington Post suggests that these complaints played a significant role in the board’s decision to fire Altman.
The sources assert that Altman’s behaviour would have made it challenging for the board to effectively oversee the CEO. Additionally, Altman was accused of lying to the board in an attempt to have another board member, Helen Toner, ousted.
Another report sheds light on the conflict between Altman and Toner, who disagreed on the direction OpenAI should take. Toner, an academic, had co-authored a paper critical of OpenAI’s decision to release ChatGPT at a specific time.
Allegedly, Altman accused her of harming OpenAI and actively sought support from other board members to have her fired.
While the prevailing theory initially pointed to disagreements over the pace of AI technology commercialization, evidence now suggests that Altman’s personality and behaviour were substantial factors in his ousting.
Toner, commenting on Altman’s firing, stated that the decision aimed to strengthen OpenAI and align with the organization’s original mission.
Despite Altman’s reinstatement as CEO, the aftermath has left lingering questions. The Washington Post report notes that Altman’s removal jeopardized an investment deal that allowed long-time employees to sell their stock back to OpenAI, impacting the company’s internal dynamics.
OpenAI and Altman have resumed operations, with Microsoft integrating the startup’s tools into its Copilot virtual assistant. However, Altman’s image may have sustained lasting damage, requiring time for the repercussions to fully unfold and clarity to emerge from the unresolved situation.
(With inputs from agencies)