Opinion | China must shield the rest of its economy from the property contagion

What is more alarming is the extent of the crisis across real estate and other sectors of the world’s second-largest economy, and the real dangers if policymakers opt for pathways that could extend the recession and depth of the downturn.

Evergrande is only part of an even larger real estate collapse, which is affecting China’s economic growth, consumer confidence and prospects. Country Garden, once China’s largest real estate developer by sales, is also in default. JP Morgan estimates that developers responsible for 40 per cent of China’s home sales have defaulted since 2021.

Given the direct link between housing asset values and consumer confidence, and real estate making up 25 per cent of the economy, the impact of the unfolding housing bust is shocking to investors and China’s policymakers.

08:36

A vanishing fairyland dream: how China Evergrande rose, then crashed

A vanishing fairyland dream: how China Evergrande rose, then crashed

Professors Atif Mian and Amir Sufi in House of Debt showed us (using the US housing bust of 2007-2008) that deep recessions are always linked to housing price declines. As prices fall, consumers (even those with large down payments) feel poorer and pull back on spending.

This is what hits an economy and its banks especially hard; all economies rely considerably on consumer spending and confidence. When spending slips, confidence drops, the economy slows or contracts. We can see this in the low levels of consumer spending post-Covid in China; a hoped-for rebound did not occur.

China’s policymakers need to avoid creating zombie real estate firms, which stagger on, paying some bills and not others, completing some flats but not all. Restructure if possible, but liquidate as required. Selling to buyers able to build on firmer economic footings will be painful, but it is part of the solution.

Yes, in the short term, the pain is great (as it was in Ireland’s housing bust in 2000). But keeping these companies on expensive financial life support, in the hope they can stagger on to eventual health, could drain resources from the rest of the economy.

This is a key lesson from Japan’s real estate bust. Above all, avoid saddling banks with a growing portfolio of non-performing loans. Doing so constricts lending and the banks react by pulling back other lending and financing to productive parts of the economy. Leaving too much of the burden on banks could extend the drag on the economy. Unfortunately, this may be happening in China.

16:50

Can China learn lessons from Japan’s ‘lost 30 years’?

Can China learn lessons from Japan’s ‘lost 30 years’?

Xiao Yuanqi, deputy head of China’s National Financial Regulatory Administration, has stressed banks have an “unshirkable responsibility” and urged them to provide “strong support” to real estate firms. This means the extension of new loans to pay off other loans on the books of ailing real estate firms. The People’s Bank of China has also cut bank reserve requirements and urged banks to exercise forbearance on real estate loans. Although understandable, this may risk throwing good money after bad.
China should not risk a “Japanification” of its economy and a long period of slow growth and deflation. With Chinese house prices much higher – at 29 times income in 2020 – than pre-bust Japan, and vacancy rates that are also higher than pre-bust Japan, the dangers of a prolonged downturn are real.

China can absorb its property crisis. Can US and Europe say the same for theirs?

China’s banks should lend only to companies that can recover and restructure their businesses. Risk must be carefully managed. Banks should assume the economic downturn could be prolonged, not that there will be a sudden economic rebound, which is unlikely. Real estate firms that cannot be rescued need to go bust and have their assets sold. Creative destruction must be allowed to take place.

There is one overriding lesson from past housing busts, banking crises and recessions, whether in Ireland, Japan, the United States or China: strict consistent regulation and supervision is needed when a boom is under way, and profits are outsize. During a boom, risk takers always assure officials that their practices and business models are sound. Yet when the boom turns to bust, we often find that many companies were promising unrealistic returns, built on faulty practices.

Avoiding overburdening banks is not the only issue, but banks are the transmission mechanism, the engine of the economy. China’s leaders need to be careful not to infect finance with the real estate sector’s malaise, or the length and depth of the downturn could be far longer than many expect, and the economic pain more widespread and damaging.

William R. Rhodes is president and CEO of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors LLC, and a former CEO of Citibank

Stuart P.M. Mackintosh is executive director of the Group of Thirty

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Chronicles Live is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – chronicleslive.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment